Skip to content
Getting Pregnant2 min read

Wearable fertility trackers: Questions About Accuracy and Validation

A wearable can collect information while you sleep, which may feel easier than taking a manual temperature every morning. Before relying on the result, ask what the device measures and what evidence supports the particular conclusion it displays.

Separate the sensor from the interpretation

A device may measure skin temperature and then use an algorithm to estimate a cycle event. The temperature measurement, the estimated ovulation date and a prediction about the next cycle are different outputs.

Some systems provide an estimate only after the likely event. That can help organize a record, but it cannot turn a past estimate into advance knowledge for that same cycle. Our BBT overview explains this timing limitation.

Ask what the validation study actually tested

Look for the exact device and software version, who took part, how many cycles were assessed, and what comparison was used. A study using urine LH as its reference is answering a different question from one directly comparing results with clinical ultrasound assessment.

Check whether the study included people with irregular cycles, relevant conditions, breastfeeding or shift work. A high sounding accuracy figure is hard to interpret without knowing the population, outcome and allowed error in days.

Keep the intended use clear

A general cycle estimate is not automatically a method of contraception or a medical diagnosis. Some medical apps have a specific authorized contraceptive use with their own instructions; that does not transfer to every tracker or to a compatible sensor used alone.

Read the current instructions for the feature you actually use. The ovulation calculator guide explains why a polished display can still represent uncertainty.

Decide whether the output changes a useful decision

Consider whether the result helps you plan, prepares a question for a clinician, or simply creates more alerts to interpret. Ask how missing nights, illness or a change in device affects the estimate.

A wearable does not remove the need for assessment when periods are persistently irregular or other fertility concerns exist. You can use technology as a record without asking it to answer every medical question.

References
  1. Zhu and colleagues: Prospective comparison of wrist temperature and basal body temperature (opens in a new tab)
  2. Apple: Retrospective ovulation estimates and their limitations (opens in a new tab)
  3. FDA: Birth control and medical software applications (opens in a new tab)
  4. ASRM: Fertility evaluation (opens in a new tab)

Lifeing Editorial

Stories for a little more understanding, a little more reassurance, and the everyday moments in between.

Next post

Weight and fertility: Discussing Health Without Crash Diets